ToolJoltTools

Cutter Consumption — Granite (CAI ~4)

Disc/tool consumption and change shifts for granite (cai ~4).

0
Excavated volume (m³)
0
Cutters consumed
0
Cutter budget ($k)
0
Change shifts

Granite consumption near 150 m³ per cutter makes the 19-inch disc choice standard — bigger rings carry more wearable steel per change. Track consumption per FACE position; gauge cutters die 2–3× faster than center ones.

Formula

cutters = (π/4·D²·L) ÷ m³-per-cutter
References: Colorado School of Mines TBM performance model; NTNU prediction model — hard-rock TBM performance

Note: Planning-level tunnelling estimate — actual TBM performance is set by detailed geotechnical baseline data, machine design and the contractor's means & methods. Use for feasibility framing only.

Disc/tool consumption and change shifts for granite (cai ~4). A free tbm performance & tunnelling tool — no sign-up, no upload, instant results in your browser.

About Cutter Consumption — Granite (CAI ~4)

Cutter Consumption — Granite (CAI ~4) computes the governing relationship cutters = (π/4·D²·L) ÷ m³-per-cutter live as you type. Granite consumption near 150 m³ per cutter makes the 19-inch disc choice standard — bigger rings carry more wearable steel per change. Track consumption per FACE position; gauge cutters die 2–3× faster than center ones. Defaults are pre-filled with realistic values for this exact scenario, and the worked example substitutes your numbers step by step so the math is never a black box.

How to use Cutter Consumption — Granite (CAI ~4)

  1. 1Enter your values — TBM diameter, Drive length, Rock volume per cutter, Cutter cost (supplied+fitted) and more (sensible defaults are pre-filled).
  2. 2Read the live results: Excavated volume, Cutters consumed, Cutter budget, Change shifts.
  3. 3Check the "with your numbers" line to see cutters = (π/4·D²·L) ÷ m³-per-cutter substituted step by step.
  4. 4Adjust inputs until the scenario matches yours, then copy or share the result.

Why use Cutter Consumption — Granite (CAI ~4)?

  • Instant, free and private — every calculation runs client-side in your browser; nothing is uploaded
  • Built on the stated formula cutters = (π/4·D²·L) ÷ m³-per-cutter with authoritative sources cited on the page (Colorado School of Mines TBM performance model; NTNU prediction model — hard-rock TBM performance)
  • Granite consumption near 150 m³ per cutter makes the 19-inch disc choice standard — bigger rings carry more wearable steel per change.
  • SI ⇄ Imperial toggle converts your inputs in place, so you can work in the units your drawings use

Frequently asked questions

What formula does the cutter consumption — granite (cai ~4) use?+

It evaluates cutters = (π/4·D²·L) ÷ m³-per-cutter, exactly as published. Sources: Colorado School of Mines TBM performance model; NTNU prediction model — hard-rock TBM performance. The substituted worked example on the page lets you verify every step against the textbook.

How should I read the result — and how far can I trust it?+

Granite consumption near 150 m³ per cutter makes the 19-inch disc choice standard — bigger rings carry more wearable steel per change. Planning-level tunnelling estimate — actual TBM performance is set by detailed geotechnical baseline data, machine design and the contractor's means & methods. Use for feasibility framing only.

When is this calculator the right tool for the job?+

Disc/tool consumption and change shifts for granite (cai ~4). A free tbm performance & tunnelling tool. Track consumption per FACE position; gauge cutters die 2–3× faster than center ones. For neighbouring scenarios, the related tools below cover the same engine with different presets.

Does it support both metric and imperial units?+

Yes — the SI ⇄ Imperial toggle converts the values already in the fields, preserving the physical quantity, so you can flip mid-calculation without re-entering anything.

Related tools

Related Manufacturing tools

Sponsored