ToolJoltTools

Motion Comfort Ratio Calculator (Brewer)

Ted Brewer's tongue-in-cheek-turned-canonical comfort ratio: how corky or steady a boat feels in a seaway, from displacement, length and beam.

0
Comfort ratio
0
Motion character

Brewer devised it half in jest; the fleet adopted it in earnest because it works: heavy boats with moderate beam accelerate gently in waves (comfort = low acceleration), while wide light hulls snap. Beam's 1.33 exponent is the snap.

Formula

CR = ฮ” รท [0.65 ร— (0.7ยทLWL + 0.3ยทLOA) ร— B^1.33] โ€” weight per unit of motion-driving geometry
References: Brewer, T., Understanding Boat Design (comfort ratio); Skene's Elements of Yacht Design (Kinney, 8th ed.)

โš ๏ธ For planning and education only โ€” verify with your vessel's documentation, naval-architecture data and official sources. Not for navigation or stability decisions on real voyages without professional data.

Ted Brewer's tongue-in-cheek-turned-canonical comfort ratio: how corky or steady a boat feels in a seaway, from displacement, length and beam.

About Motion Comfort Ratio Calculator (Brewer)

Seasickness is an acceleration problem, and Ted Brewer's comfort ratio โ€” invented, he admitted, half as a joke โ€” captures it well enough that brokers quote it fifty years later: displacement divided by a beam-and-length term approximating how abruptly waves can toss the hull. Under 20 is dinghy-lively; over 40 is sip-your-coffee-on-passage. This calculator computes it with the standard bands and the honest footnote about what one number can't know.

How to use Motion Comfort Ratio Calculator (Brewer)

  1. 1Enter โ€” sensible defaults are pre-filled so you see a worked result immediately.
  2. 2Read the live results: .
  3. 3Check the "With your numbers" line to see the formula CR = ฮ” รท [0.65 ร— (0.7ยทLWL + 0.3ยทLOA) ร— B^1.33] โ€” weight per unit of motion-driving geometry substituted step by step.
  4. 4Adjust inputs (or flip the unit toggle) until the scenario matches yours, then copy or share the result.

Why use Motion Comfort Ratio Calculator (Brewer)?

  • โœ“Instant, free and private โ€” every calculation runs in your browser, nothing is uploaded
  • โœ“Built on the published formula CR = ฮ” รท [0.65 ร— (0.7ยทLWL + 0.3ยทLOA) ร— B^1.33] โ€” weight per unit of motion-driving geometry with sources cited on the page
  • โœ“Brewer devised it half in jest; the fleet adopted it in earnest because it works: heavy boats with moderate beam accelerate gently in waves (comfort = low acceleration), while wide light hulls snap. Beam's 1.33 exponent is the snap.
  • โœ“Switch units, tweak any input and watch every result update live

Frequently asked questions

What physically makes a high-comfort-ratio boat comfortable?+

Inertia versus wave force: a heavy hull presenting moderate beam to the sea accelerates slowly when a wave shoulders it โ€” and human inner ears object to acceleration, not motion per se. Light, beamy hulls (great for form stability and interior volume) get snapped quickly by every wave face: less roll ANGLE sometimes, but far more roll ACCELERATION, which is what stomachs score.

Why does beam appear with an exponent of 1.33?+

Brewer's empirical capture of beam's double mischief: wider hulls both generate larger righting moments per degree (stiffer, snappier roll) and present more waterplane for waves to lever. The super-linear exponent encodes that beam hurts motion comfort faster than it grows โ€” the design tension behind every modern wide-stern cruiser, which buys interior and downwind power at the comfort ratio's expense.

How should I actually use the number when boat shopping?+

As a comparison within type, not an absolute verdict: between two 35-footers under consideration, CR 22 vs 34 predicts a real difference on a lumpy channel crossing. It can't see daggers like a slamming flat forefoot, a corky stern, or rig-induced snap-roll โ€” sea trials in chop remain the truth. Pair it with D/L (heaviness) and capsize ratio (beam vs displacement) for the standard broker-spec triad.

Do catamarans and trimarans break the formula?+

Completely โ€” it was derived for ballasted monohulls. Multihulls ride on form stability with no ballast and entirely different motion physics: quick, small-amplitude motions instead of rolling. Their comfort metrics (bridge-deck clearance, weight-to-length, beam-to-length) are a different toolbox; running a cat through this formula produces a number with no meaning.

Related tools

Related Field tools

Sponsored