ToolJoltTools

Metric to Inch Tire Size Converter

Turn 285/75R16 into '33-inch' truck-speak and back: overall diameter, section width and the flotation-size equivalent of any metric tire.

0
Overall diameter (in)
0
Diameter (mm)
0
Section width (in)
0
Flotation equivalent

The classic equivalences every off-road forum repeats: 285/75R16 โ‰ˆ 33ร—11.50, 315/75R16 โ‰ˆ 35ร—12.50, 265/75R16 โ‰ˆ 31.6โ€ณ. 'Nominal' flotation sizes round generously โ€” a tire sold as a 33 often measures 32.5โ€ณ loaded.

Formula

diameter (in) = rim + 2 ร— (width ร— aspect/100) / 25.4; flotation = DIAxWIDTHRrim
References: Tire and Rim Association Year Book (tire dimension standards); Toyo / BFGoodrich flotationโ€“metric equivalence charts

โš ๏ธ Estimates for planning and education โ€” verify fitment, gearing and speeds against manufacturer data and local law. Never test results on public roads.

Turn 285/75R16 into '33-inch' truck-speak and back: overall diameter, section width and the flotation-size equivalent of any metric tire.

About Metric to Inch Tire Size Converter

Truck and off-road culture talks in inches โ€” 31s, 33s, 35s, 37s โ€” while the sidewall speaks metric: 285/75R16. The translation isn't on the tire anywhere. This converter computes overall diameter and section width in inches from any metric size, builds the flotation-format equivalent (33ร—11.50R16-style), and shows the millimetre numbers for the rest of the world. Essential before lift-kit shopping, gear-ratio planning, or arguing on a forum.

How to use Metric to Inch Tire Size Converter

  1. 1Enter โ€” sensible defaults are pre-filled so you see a worked result immediately.
  2. 2Read the live results: .
  3. 3Check the "With your numbers" line to see the formula diameter (in) = rim + 2 ร— (width ร— aspect/100) / 25.4; flotation = DIAxWIDTHRrim substituted step by step.
  4. 4Adjust inputs (or flip the unit toggle) until the scenario matches yours, then copy or share the result.

Why use Metric to Inch Tire Size Converter?

  • โœ“Instant, free and private โ€” every calculation runs in your browser, nothing is uploaded
  • โœ“Built on the published formula diameter (in) = rim + 2 ร— (width ร— aspect/100) / 25.4; flotation = DIAxWIDTHRrim with sources cited on the page
  • โœ“The classic equivalences every off-road forum repeats: 285/75R16 โ‰ˆ 33ร—11.50, 315/75R16 โ‰ˆ 35ร—12.50, 265/75R16 โ‰ˆ 31.6โ€ณ. 'Nominal' flotation sizes round generously โ€” a tire sold as a 33 often measures 32.5โ€ณ loaded.
  • โœ“Switch units, tweak any input and watch every result update live

Frequently asked questions

Why doesn't a '33-inch' tire measure 33 inches?+

Flotation names are nominal: the unloaded design diameter rounds to friendly numbers, and the tire then sags under load (loaded radius runs 2โ€“4% less), wears up to half an inch of tread away, and varies by manufacturer mold. A 285/75R16 computes to 32.8โ€ณ and typically stands 32.3โ€“32.5โ€ณ mounted and loaded. Diameter math is for comparing sizes โ€” measure the actual tire when clearance is tight.

What metric sizes correspond to 33s, 35s and 37s?+

Common equivalences: 33โ€ณ โ‰ˆ 285/75R16, 285/70R17 or 275/70R18; 35โ€ณ โ‰ˆ 315/75R16, 315/70R17 or 295/70R18; 37โ€ณ โ‰ˆ 355/70R17 or 37ร—12.50R17 sold directly in flotation. Note how the same nominal height spreads across rim sizes by trading sidewall โ€” pick by the wheel you run, then verify the computed diameter here, because '35s' span 34.5 to 35.2 real inches across brands.

Why do flotation and metric versions of the 'same' size behave differently?+

Flotation-size tires are usually built as LT (light truck) with tougher casings, higher load ranges, deeper tread and more weight; the metric 'equivalent' may be a P-metric or Euro-metric passenger construction. Same diameter, different animal: LT versions need higher pressures for the same load, ride stiffer, cost fuel economy, and shrug off rock damage their P-metric twins won't. The number on this page only settles geometry.

Does width in inches matter for rim choice?+

Yes โ€” each tire has an approved rim-width range roughly centred on section width รท 25.4 minus 25%: a 285 (11.2โ€ณ) tire wants about an 8โ€“9.5โ€ณ rim. Too narrow a rim pinches the tread crown; too wide stretches the bead and exposes the rim lip. The flotation second number (the 11.50 in 33ร—11.50) is section width on the measuring rim, so it maps straight onto rim-width tables.

Related tools

Related Field tools

Sponsored